tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-347683455597417526.post3320601346991756992..comments2024-02-28T20:08:29.312-08:00Comments on The Pictorial Arts: Photo PortraitThomas Haller Buchananhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09278003392092477845noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-347683455597417526.post-45247431517132073922010-08-12T09:23:15.605-07:002010-08-12T09:23:15.605-07:00Any successful portrait is a partnership between s...Any successful portrait is a partnership between subject and photographer, of course more so when the subject is capable of controlled nuance and the photographer is sensitive to every aspect of the image. Ryder is of course 'acting' for the camera, and Leibovitz is of course 'directing' her subject. Rather like making a movie that doesn't move.<br /><br />What a wonderful job Leibovitz has.Thomas Haller Buchananhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09278003392092477845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-347683455597417526.post-19494341161566893192010-08-12T09:13:18.273-07:002010-08-12T09:13:18.273-07:00That is very nice. I wonder how much of this is Li...That is very nice. I wonder how much of this is Liebovitz,and how much is Ryder? When she takes photos of non-actors you can assume,(or at least,I do), that Liebovitz is the major part of the photo. Taking a pic of someone who's job is portraying an image has to change the dynamic there. Never haven taken portrait photos of famous actors myself, I don't know this, but it seems that way to me.E.G.Palmerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10229893317543621720noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-347683455597417526.post-69136043043278125032010-08-11T18:41:01.254-07:002010-08-11T18:41:01.254-07:00yeah that's a nice one!yeah that's a nice one!Artman2112https://www.blogger.com/profile/03062864368596074661noreply@blogger.com